LICENSING & LITIGATION
1
Licensing/litigation strategy planning
2
Infringement and stability analysis
3
Investigation and evidence collection
4
Licensing negotiation support
5
Administrative enforcement
6
Global litigation management
7
Countermeasures in China and the U.S.
Practice Area
Strategic Planning and Global Management
+
Rich experience in managing global licensing and litigation matters: We have managed over 50 patent litigation cases worldwide, and we take particular pride in being able to provide comprehensive and innovative solutions in resolving our clients’ IP global disputes.
We provide our clients with professional, efficient, and practical strategies, and we can team with external counsels to carry out overseas litigation strategy in a cost-effective manner. We offer flexible and customized fee arrangements to fulfill different needs of our clients.
Vast experience in bringing counterclaim litigation in China: We assist our clients in re-gaining leverage by taking legal actions in China as countermeasures.
Flexible Licensing Negotiation Strategy and Integrated Solution
+
We excel at utilizing our industry experience and business network to reach favorable licensing results for our clients.
We excel at creating win-win solutions for our clients with their counterparts by deploying flexible patent monetization measures.
We excel at conducting licensing negotiations and providing strategic counseling to help our clients obtain favorable licensing or settlement terms.
Building World-class Litigation Defense Network
+
We are a member in a top global lawyer cooperation network organized by China’s IP organizations, covering the world’s leading law firms in the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, UK, France, Italy, and Japan, etc.
Our licensing & litigation team comprises former members of top-notch law firms and corporate legal departments. With profound legal background and practical industry experience, as well as deep understanding of both Eastern and Western cultures, they can fully understand and address the needs of Chinese multi-national companies caught in a complex overseas IP dispute.
Through intensive and unimpeded cooperation and communication with top law firms worldwide, we are able to provide one-stop services to Chinese enterprises in coping with complicated international IPR disputes, 24/7.
Ericsson v. A global telecom company (Purplevine’s client)
Overview: Purplevine represented a leading global telecommunication company in a patent litigation brought by Ericsson in the Eastern District of Texas (“EDTX”). At the beginning of case, our client successfully invalidated four of five patents-in-suit, and filed a motion for summary judgement for the remaining patent on the ground that the asserted claims were ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The EDTX denied the motion, and the case proceeded to trial, where the jury ruled that the client infringed Ericsson’s patent and awarded $110 million for damages and compensation. Upon Purplevine’s recommendation, the client appealed the case to the US Court of Appeals (“CAFC”). In April 2020, the CAFC accepted our argument and ruled that the remaining patent was ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Such ruling vacated the EDTX’s $110 million damage judgement against our client.
NPE v. A global telecom company (Purplevine’s client)
Overview: Purplevine's client, a global telecom company, was sued for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court by an international NPE (Non-Practicing Entity). After taking over the case management, the Purplevine IP team conducted technical analysis and formulated litigation response strategies for the patent in question. In addition to fighting this NPE in litigation proceedings, the Purplevine team evaluated the feasibility of bringing IPR proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Finally, as a result of the PTAB's investigation, the NPE's ongoing patent infringement litigation may be suspended; if the patent in question were eventually invalidated, the damages arising from the series of lawsuits would also be extinguished. The NPE thus chose to quickly reach a settlement with Purplevine's client and filed a joint motion to stay proceedings with the PTAB.
A leading panel manufacturer (Purplevine’s client) v. a Competitor
Overview: Purplevine represented a leading panel manufacturer in a lawsuit against its competitor in China. During the proceeding, the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court accepted our request of freezing a large amount of defendant’s funds and issuing an injunction enjoining the defendant from making products utilizing the patent-in-suit.